- Fencer A attacked.
- Fencer B parried, but didn't riposte immediately.
- Fencer A continued the attack, and hit.
- Fencer B riposted and hit.
- Both fencer's hits registered at the same time.
I thought about it, but eventually awarded the point to fencer A. Although a parry riposte grants you right of way, it can only be awarded, if the riposte is immediate. Therefore, fencer A seized priority by continuing his attack into the delayed riposte. I told them of my decision, and fencer B didn't take it very well. He ripped off his mask, and demanded that I phrase the attacks. I explained to him my reasons behind the decision, and eventually, he put his mask back on, and walked back on to the piste, grumbling as he went.
I can't respect anyone who accosts the referee for making the 'wrong decision', anyone who tries to scrape points together by accosting the referee, or anyone who refuses to acknowledge a clear hit.
3 comments:
There isn't a wrong decision.
Right ones are pretty hard to come by, though!
Fencer B can go roast his pride, frankly, because referees are there to interpret an inexact science (like reading livers and entrails for to see the future...) so don't take no crap from anyone! (gold class advice there... *smacks forehead*)
What you say is true. The referee's decision is final, after all...
If you always act with integrity you can't do more than that. Stay ture to your opinions, phrase things clearly and remain impartial.
Post a Comment